biological entities exist safely and variety to the statistics, but if you have a certain degree of complexity and intelligent it is not possible to know. They may be simple archaea such as exist here on earth living under inhospitable conditions such as water at 130 °, full of sulfur and other toxic substances, also inhabit the soil depths to 6 km depth without being exposed to sunlight or any of its radiation, the same bacteria are capable of supporting up to 160 degrees below zero in the depths of the poles and may live in meteorites and comets as they can safely get to endure these conditions. These Archaea are more primitive beings on this planet with an age of 4000 million years old, so they are considered the first life on Earth. There are many hypotheses on the origin of life on this planet: A combination of amino acids created simple protein macromolecules attached to a lightning generated bacterial life in the seas, another recent hypothesis that there is talk of a relationship with the origin of our natural satellite, is a full and direct collision ...
Continue Reading ...
... from a planet called Orpheus with seas teeming with life, the shock was so intense that the nuclei fuse and the only survivors of Orpheus was the bacterial life that colonized our oceans (the remains of the planet formed the Moon) and the latter hypothesis speaks of meteor impacts with microbial life inside. NASA's exobiologists focus on analyzing search for extraterrestrials bacterial life forms living here in the most extreme environments listed above, while those ufologists believe that beings are shaped humanoid extraterrestrials visiting us. Of these biological entities anthropomorphic debate is ... The questions are: how to have become what they are and how they got transported to our planet. Perhaps the great contradiction of the UFO phenomena is that the media want to sell us an image as representing a humanoid intelligent species extraterrestrials. Is almost simple overturn this hypothesis, a biology student admirer of Darwin or a professional evolutionist. May clarify this point to elaborate later in my slight tendency towards a start minoría.Para want to clarify that I believe in the UFO phenomenon in the strict sense, since there is as such, but I personally do not believe in alien biological entities the media or the leaders of some countries want to sell us. The vast majority of ufologists tends to hypothesize that they are biological entities extraterráqueas. Continued with the clarification, I refer to biological entities and non-living things because the human species has established eight innate characteristics to what he calls life (and never was able to formulate a concept of term life) indeed, it is possible that the man does not recognize these entities (intelligent or not) when detected. I also refer to extraterrestrials land as the term is incorrect because the latter is used for forms of life outside this planet and which are adapted to life on and / or on the floor of the continents. These are words used by exobiologists (specialists in "extraterrestrial life"). I humbly that the error of these researchers is to simply assume, rather than inferred. Nor should we blindly trust inference and analogy with existing here on this planet. The famous humanoid figure shows a large cranial cavity (with a possible large cephalization), predominance of the visual areas with large loss of body pigmentation, loss of body muscle tone, apparent loss of sexual organs and increased numbers of fingers with a greater extension of themselves. Explication: the largest cranial capacity and cephalization involve in most cases greater intelligence, visual areas contributes to the use and development of certain brain areas in the cerebral hemispheres, the loss of pigmentation occurs in some cases, certain irrespective of the medium as well as the loss of muscle tone, increase in the number of the fingers involves greater use of tools and also contributes to the development head, finally, the "perceived loss of sexuality may be caused by a huge regardless of the means by which genetic exchange would not need to reinforce these characteristics ADN.Todas Anatomical product of evolution are clearly noticeable in the order Primates especially flias. Pongidae and Hominidae in the latter is the Man. Then we can conclude that if one planet, with one cycle of rotation and translation time (day-year), same gravitational force, the same density of air, relative similarity in terms of provision oxygen and another large cluster of environmental conditions exist in the same medium from a blue whale to an Archaean (primitive bacteria), would be unthinkable to conceive that human-like alien. Why do I say this? Because if two bodies under these same conditions differ in their anatomy (internal and external) and its physiology (function), by a subtle difference, it is statistically almost impossible for another agency in another planet, another cycle and rotation schedule translation, other than gravitational force, different atmospheric density, different arrangement of oxygen (if any as it is proved that life does not necessarily need to exist), multicellular life to develop intelligence and enough technology to visit like the globe and just to us humans. You could say it is almost impossible, no less reasonable or credible and this lógico.Por said he had a tendency, not position (that is, not what I say) with the minority which posits that biological entities extraterráqueas these humanoids are actually descendants Homo sapiens sapiens on the evolutionary scale from the future with technology advanced enough to do so. The human being now has the theory called Einstein-Rosen bridge which provides the theoretical shape to travel through time and space but not the practice because it ensures that man does not have enough technology to implement it. Moreover at the time of declaration and at present continues to believe that such technology is unattainable. This plus all the evolutionary patterns especially in the light (80% of the information captured by a Human is visual, associated with large black eyes) appointed to continue today, suggests that we really are coming to greet us " neighbors in the morning. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment